Talent Screening and Assessment Software Guide
HireScore vs Pymetrics
View this side-by-side comparison of Pymetrics vs HireScore based on data from user reviews and publicly available information on HireScore and Pymetrics, to help you make the best choice for your recruitment needs.
Comparing Pymetrics and HireScore
Selecting between Pymetrics and HireScore depends on your recruitment requirements and the kind of experience you desire to give to your applicants. Pymetrics employs neuroscience-based games and AI to evaluate potential hires, providing a unique, engaging and bias-free candidate experience. On the other hand, HireScore offers a more traditional approach, using psychometric assessments and custom job simulations to evaluate candidates, with an emphasis on objectivity and fairness.
Pymetrics and HireScore are both assessment software solutions with distinct aims and functions. Pymetrics uses neuroscience-based games and artificial intelligence to assess candidates' cognitive and emotional traits, aiming to make the hiring process more predictive and less biased. Its main utility lies in its ability to uncover hidden talents, promote diversity, and improve the quality of hire. On the other hand, HireScore prioritizes a more comprehensive assessment of candidates' skills, interests, and fit within a role or organization. Its strength lies in its thoroughness: it uses psychometric tests, competency-based assessments, and situational judgement tests to ensure a holistic understanding of the candidate's capabilities. Both offer unique tools to enhance the hiring process but differ in their approach and focus.
Choose Gyfted over Pymetrics
Pymetrics and HireScore Features Comparison
Candidate Screening
Candidate Comparisons
Candidate Ranking
Talent Development
Customizable Tests
(depends on vendor)
Dashboard Reporting
Personality Testing
Cognitive Testing
Psychometrics
Pymetrics and HireScore ease of use and candidate experience
Pymetrics offers a unique UX, focusing on gamified assessments that aim to make the process enjoyable for candidates. This innovative approach to evaluation not only provides a refreshing candidate experience but also generates in-depth data for employers. On the other hand, HireScore offers a more traditional approach to candidate assessment. The platform is known for its user-friendly design and structured assessments, offering a straightforward, efficient testing experience for candidates. However, unlike Pymetrics, it lacks the element of gamification and the depth of data generation.
Pymetrics
HireScore
Gyfted
UX and Candidate Experience
Pymetrics is a software product renowned for its ease of use and positive candidate experience. As an AI-driven platform, it employs neuroscience games and bias-free algorithms to predictively match users with their most suited jobs, creating an engaging and user-friendly process. The platform's innovative approach to job matching not only simplifies the job search but also ensures a fair, unbiased process, enhancing the overall candidate experience. The intuitive design and straightforward interface make it accessible to users of different tech-savviness levels, contributing to its reputation for ease of use.
Stang Decision Systems, operating through their platform HireScore.com, offers a user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to navigate and utilize its features efficiently. The platform is designed to enhance the candidate experience, providing streamlined application processes, timely feedback and transparent communication. With a focus on reducing hiring time and improving the quality of hire, the software combines assessment science, data analytics, and digital technology to ensure an effective and efficient experience for both candidates and recruiters.
AI-powered psychometric assessments with a gamified, DuoLingo-like experience. Free for test-takers, intuitive UX designed to engage candidates and provide personalized feedback. Founded in Stanford, CA, in 2020.
Entry Price (August 2023)
Custom
$600.00/month
Custom
Who is it for?
Recruiters
Organizations who want to have the most accurate hiring process in the world.
Remote companies, startups, mid-market, enterprises, recruitment agencies looking for adaptive assessments for talent matching and development.
Key Market Segments
Mid-Market
Mid-Market
Mid-market
G2 Review Rating (August 2023)
3.5
n/a
-
TrustPilot Review Rating (August 2023)
n/a
n/a
4.5
Number of G2 User Reviews
4
n/a
-
Ease of Use
7
n/a
9
Ease of Setup
n/a
n/a
10
Quality of Support
n/a
n/a
9.5
Product Direction (% positive)
n/a
n/a
10
Pre-made Test Library and Test Customization
Pymetrics does provide a pre-made test library, but it focuses heavily on neuroscience-based games and ethical AI technology to assess candidates. There is no clear evidence of customization options for their tests.
HireScore does not provide a pre-made test library. However, it offers the option to create customized assessments based on job-specific competencies.
Customizable AI-powered psychometric assessments tailored to specific company needs.
Assessment Categories
Diversity Recruiting
Pre-employment Testing
Talent Marketplace
Applicant Tracking
Onboarding
Pre-employment Testing
Recruiting
Psychometric, behavioral, cognitive assessments for talent development and matching, offering free access to individuals.
Company Information
pymetrics
Founded: 2007
United States
www.pymetrics.ai/
Stang Decision Systems
Founded: 2001
United States
hirescore.com
Founded: 2020, United States, www.gyfted.me
Choose Gyfted's Culture Canvas over Pymetrics and HireScore
Gyfted takes a modern, future of work approach to candidate assessments that is in stark contrast to traditional assessment industry practices. We do not just test candidates, we pride ourselves in matching them for role fit and cultural (values) fit.
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
Traditional assessment companies tend to focus on quantity, charging per candidate or per test. This mode of operation doesn't necessarily consider the quality of matches or the long-term fit of a candidate within a company's culture or role. Their main priority is often to process as many tests as possible, resulting in a less personalized experience that may not accurately identify the best fit for both parties, and more spending by companies, while driving a worse candidate experience (with candidate's running on the testing hamster wheel in various recruitment marathons across companies - being re-tested, re-questioned and screened about basically the same stuff from company to company).
At Gyfted we emphasize quality and outcomes. We prioritize the candidate experience first. We know that a positive one attracts top talent and leads to better matches over time. Our software is built around proven assessment standards and theories, offering a range of assessments from Personality testing (Big Five) to EQ to Abstract Reasoning, and above all testing for Team Cultural Add/Fit. We don't just aim to find a candidate who can do the job, but one who also aligns with the company's culture and values, and can seamlessly integrate into the existing team dynamics. We've aligned our business model with customers. Instead of charging per test or per candidate, we charge a monthly SaaS fee based on the organization size and package - our pricing is designed to give you value, not limit usage, and enable a great candidate experience.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.
This model aligns us with our clients, as we're incentivized to ensure successful matches and longevity in placements, not just to increase the number of tests taken. We understand that a successful hire is about more than just skills - it's about finding mutual right fit for your team and your role, as well as talent development once inside the company.